DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE - Essay ExampleAfter pulling some strings, his family was able to lop a liver for Krampitz. The donor heard about the need of his liver through the media campaign launched by Krampitzs family. However, a liver transplant lone(prenominal) bought Krampitz other eight months. Doctors had already foretold that due to the aggressive nature of cancer, the disease will not be cured even after a transplant. At the time Krampitz got a donor, thither were 16000 other better suited candidates on the UNOS wait list. Krampitz was able to jump this queue of 16000, better suited candidates because of his publicity stunt. The doubt is, was it ethically correct for Krampitz to jump ahead of so many people only because he could? This publicity stunt may have found a donor who would not have been found otherwise but the ethical dilemma of distribution of organs is still there. This dilemma when viewed under Distributive justice can provide a better understanding and analysis o f situations such as the one mentioned above. What Krampitz did is legal, technically speaking he never breached any uprightness (Delvoye, 2004). It all boils down to the matter of ethics, how well Krampitzs case weighs on the moral scale? Distributive justice pertains to fair distribution of economic resources among far-flung community (Maiese, 2003). This distribution revolves around three factors, number or resources, the procedure and the pattern of distribution (Maiese, 2003). Distributive justice applies to organ donation because there atomic number 18 simply not enough for everyone (Center for Bioethics, 2004). Going back to Krampitzs case, the procedure, pattern as well as the number of resources (healthy livers available for transplant) all seem to be against Krampitz. What Krampitz did is a violation of ethics, knowing that he was dead anyway, regardless of the transplant. Still he jumped ahead of 1600 people and got himself a healthy liver. Critically speaking, for his own pick he had to take every chance to save himself which is not wrong. But when youre a citizen, you are part of the social fabric, people are create from raw material together to keep the society powerful. Otherwise, the law of survival of the fittest prevails and that means chaos. The matter of distributive justice in healthcare is not a matter of consequential conjecture. It is not about creating an equitable society it is about what is in the best interest (mutual interest) of everybody. The idea of Distributive Justice arises in cases of organ donation because there is a wide gap between the supply and demand of human organs. Human organs for transplantation purposes are very scarce. This shortage begs a more just distribution of organs. Distributive justice aims to provide a fair distribution of scarce resources such as human organs. The distributive justice theory employs various criteria to judge and rightfully prefer one individual over another in matters of organ d istribution. The theory measures the overall utility of choosing the recipient of an organ. in that location is another side to this story, the supporters of Krampitzs case. They say that the media campaign launched by Krampitz found a person who with his own will agreed to donate the liver, therefore adding another donor to the pool of donors. Had this person not reached by Krampitzs family, he would have chosen not donate at all. This makes the case very strong for Krampitz. Krampitz identified